Machiavellian Rulers Are Focused on War in Machiavelli’s...

Machiavelli’s â€Å"The Prince† brought up some controversial characteristics on what a Machiavellian ruler is. The characteristic that was most stressed was that â€Å"A prince must have no other objective, no other thought, nor take up any profession but that of war.†(Machiavelli 37). With a main focus on the art of war a ruler can protect the state he governs from attacks against him and his state. Machiavelli offers us an analogy to prove the importance of war. He speaks of two men: one armed and one unarmed. He tells us how it would be unrealistic to believe that the armed man would obey the unarmed man. It would also be unreasonable to expect that the unarmed man would feel safe and secure if is servant held a weapon that could cause death.†¦show more content†¦An additional, trait is to be cunning and forceful. As Machiavelli said, â€Å"he ought of beasts to choose both the lion and the fox; the lion cannot guard himself from the toils, nor the fox from the wolves. He must therefore be a fox to discern toils, and a lion to drive off wolves† (Machiavelli 46) this quote means that the prince must be cunning, sneaky and sly like a fox but must also be able to defend himself and his people like a lion. One of the other qualities is keeping faith in people at a minimum. A prince should ask for advice to show that he is open to suggestion, but he should not use it unless it is what he was going to do anyway. This is because if the prince does not make decisions for himself than a revolt will be able to happen easier. Some other qualities include; wisdom, familiarity with the land he rules over, vigilance, and good fortune. Machiavelli created an image of a prince that is complex and exigent to be like due to its numerous characteristics that he needs to possess The reason this prince is difficult to obtain is because it is an intricate balance of everything, but with the high standards comes a great prince. My point of vie w on if it is successful or not. My point of view on if his description and advice is successful is that it is very successful. If a prince were to hold every characteristic that a Machiavellian ruler is defined by then the country would run smoothly and the princeShow MoreRelatedSocrates And Machiavelli s Views On Politics1464 Words   |  6 PagesSocrates and Machiavelli both lived during times of war and political transition. While both philosophers present a then-radical ideology to reform their state, they differed greatly on how to achieve that end: Socrates practiced idealism, while Machiavelli advocated for realism. Their differences of their beliefs are rooted in a conflicting perception of morality. Socrates believes morality is based on an individual’s attainment of goodness and truth, while Machiavelli concerns himself with a leader’sRead MoreConnections Between Hitler And The Prince1307 Words   |  6 Pagesand The Prince Hitler said, â€Å"Germany will either be a world power or will not be at all† (â€Å"Adolf Hitler Quote†). Adolph Hitler became the leader of the German Nazi party in 1933. His leadership was both loved and despised. He controlled the Nazi party for more than a decade (â€Å"Adolph Hitler†). Considering the length of Hitler’s reign, he must have had leadership qualities that people found admirable or they feared him so greatly that no one would attempt to overthrow him. In Machiavelli’s The PrinceRead More Machiavellian Folly in The Prince Essay1696 Words   |  7 PagesMachiavellian Folly in The Prince      Ã‚  Ã‚   In the annals of history, many individuals have contributed great works of literature, waxing philosophically on the meaning of life, death, and love.  Ã‚   Niccolo Machiavelli wrote not on love or life, but on power:   How to capture it, how to consolidate it, and how to defend it against all comers.   His work has been talked about and dissected to the extent that his subject matter and methods have earned their own moniker:   Machiavellian.   Nonetheless,Read MoreMachiavelli’s The Prince: Examples of Machiavellian Leaders Essay2048 Words   |  9 PagesArguably, the most Machiavellian leader to ever exist would be Joseph Stalin. He abided by three major Machiavellian methods that were stated in the Prince: the ends justifies the means, crush any opposition, and displaying a false character. Stalin had a plan for Russia and did everything in his power to achieve that plan. He wanted to transform Russia into a industrial superpower, a military superpo wer, and a political superpower. To achieve his goals he committed many horrible crimes againstRead MoreEssay about Machiavellis Reputation in the Modern World2985 Words   |  12 PagesMachiavellis Reputation in the Modern World Niccolà ² Machiavelli was known during much his life as a part of the republican government in Florence until 1512. At that time, the Medici family took over the city and ruled under a more monarchical system. From that point until his death in 1527, Machiavelli was always just on the outside of Florentine politics. He would occasionally get work from the Medici but his tasks were never as important as they had been under the republican governmentRead MoreMachiavelli And Socrates Similarities1437 Words   |  6 Pagessame values or view their environment in the same way. This is the case with two philosophers, Socrates and Machiavelli, who both lived during times of internal political strife. Greece was divided into numerous city states that were constantly at war with one another and hundreds of years later, Italy would also experience this political fragmentation and violence. Despite having these identical environments, Socrates and Machiavelli adopted two very distinctive and contrasting perspectives. SocratesRead More George Bush as a Machiavellian Leader Essay1428 Words   |  6 PagesGeorge Bush as a Machiavellian Leader George Bush and Niccolo Machiavelli are two very influential political figures that share some similar ideals. Machiavellis work was never intended to be applied to republics, or a democratic government. The advice written in The Prince would have likely been applied in the time of absolute government, when countries were ruled by one leader. It is a work which, as Machiavelli himself says that his philosophy is only applied to principalities, or whatRead More Separating Political Conduct and Personal Morality in Niccolà ² Machiavellis, The Prince2131 Words   |  9 PagesSeparating Political Conduct and Personal Morality in Niccolà ² Machiavellis, The Prince Niccolà ² Machiavelli wrote, in his novel The Prince, that strong central political leadership was more important than anything else, including religion and moral behavior. Machiavelli, writing during a period of dramatic change known as the Italian Renaissance, displayed attitudes towards many issues, mostly political, which supported his belief that strong government was the most important element in societyRead MoreComparing Cardinal Richelieus Practice of Ruler Ship to Niccà ²lo Machiavellis Ideas About the Effective Exercise of Power2015 Words   |  9 Pagestheir respective works: The Prince by Machiavelli and The Political Testament of Cardinal Richelieu by Richelieu himself. By rejecting conventional morals, disregarding haughty ideals, and promoting ruthless tactics, The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and The Political Testament became fundamental works in understanding realpolitik.# Letat - cest moi,# spoken by French king Louis XIV is an embodiment of Cardinal Richelieus practice of ruler ship, as well as Machiavellis theory on the necessity ofRead MoreNiccolo Machiavelli s The Prince Essay1981 Words   |  8 Pagesnation as well as being tasked with their welfare. Niccolà ² Machiavelli’s The Prince is meant to be a manual for how to handles issues of state and reputation. The handbook is comprehensive and detailed, and Machiavelli’s concept of virtà ¹ is an interesting one. Virtue and morality aren’t necessarily the same as virtà ¹, since Machiavelli conveys those concepts are not always the best for a leader to have. There are plenty of times in The Prince that virtà ¹ and morality clash. Leaders of nations are still